AIDS and Freddie Mercury

It appears that work is underway to produce a film of the life of Freddie Mercury. And yet curiously the statement has been made that the film will not deal with his illness and death from AIDS.

Whilst I understand that it is a very emotive subject both for his friends and family as well as the large number of his fans, I can only view it as a wasted opportunity to tell the truth about AIDS.

The mainstream view can be seen in this article
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1358188/Freddie-Mercurys-friend-David-Wigg-reveals-flamboyant-stars-vulnerable-loneliness-haunted-him.html

However, it includes the phrase “And the sad thing is that Freddie might still be with us today. According to members of the medical profession, if Freddie could have survived one more year, the leaps in treatment for AIDS sufferers could have saved him.”

Sadly, this is incorrect.

There are some variations of the story of AIDS, but the true story is one of which very few of you will be aware.

It would take a whole book to do justice to the story, and there are many good books available that do tell it, but suffice it to say that, yet again, the mainstream medical establishment and the mainstream media have not and are still not giving us the real story of AIDS.

If you aren’t aware that there is another story than the one pushed by the mainstream media then the following links to some highly informative websites will provide you with more than enough material to understand just how many scientists do not concur with the mainstream view.

http://www.rethinkingaids.com

http://hivskeptic.wordpress.com

http://www.virusmyth.com/aids – This site contains more than 1500 pages with over 1000 articles. Most of these articles have been published in peer reviewed journals, magazines, and newspapers.

The Virus Myth website includes the following statement by Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry:
“If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document.”

The information about HIV and AIDS provided by these websites can only lead you to the conclusion that not only did Freddie Mercury die unnecessarily, but what killed him was the very toxic medication AZT. This is not suggesting that a lesser dose of AZT would have saved him, but that not taking it would have done so.

If only those who are making this story of his life would have the nerve to tell the truth it could turn the whole AIDS industry upside down, because make no mistake there IS a whole industry making money out of our fears about AIDS.

And in case you aren’t aware of the story of AIDS in Africa here is a very well-written article about it: http://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/searching-for-truth-at-harvard/

There is, however, a small ray of hope emerging as more and more people become aware of the whole sorry business and misinformation about the HIV/AIDS story, as evidenced by the following article:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/Junk+science+AIDS/4228525/story.html

Let’s hope there are more Tommy Morrison’s out there……………..

Posted in Freedom of Speech, HIV and AIDS, Media Failure | Leave a comment

Scientists Hail Universal Flu Vaccine Test

I see in the news recently that ‘Scientists Hail Universal Flu Vaccine Test’.

But, as we’ve previously pointed out, the scientific evidence shows that no other vaccine is safe or effective, so why should we believe that this one will be.

If you want to know the scientific basis of the statement that no vaccine is safe or effective, please download a recent report HERE, if you haven’t already downloaded it from our earlier blog on vaccinations.

Of course, part of the ploy of this story is to emphasise the ‘science’ to impress us and therefore make us unable or unwilling to question it. Well it’s time for us to break out of our complacency and change that.

One of the many flaws in this ‘science’ is that it is carried out in laboratories using various pieces of technical equipment. This by its very nature is problematic precisely because illness occurs in a human body, which is not a piece of technical equipment, it’s a very complex, interconnected, self-regulating organism.

In fact it is a very sophisticated self-healing organism too, provided that it is given the right tools to do so, in the form of good nutrients, and is not impeded in this process by the introduction of too many toxins.

The mistake that the pharmaceutical industry makes is thinking that by using their equipment they can replicate the processes of a human body.

But they can’t.

This is because interventionist processes by their very nature only interfere with the body’s normal processes and this is particularly true of vaccination.

According to the reports on this universal flu vaccine, Dr Sarah Gilbert of Oxford University’s Jenner Institute said: “It wouldn’t wipe out flu from the world in the way we’ve been able to wipe out smallpox because flu exists in wild bird populations, and from time to time it moves across into the human population.”

Sadly, she is wrong on so many levels.

For a start, the medical establishment, and their ‘hero’ Jenner, didn’t wipe out smallpox by means of vaccination. To say so is a blatant untruth that, for their own purposes, is continually taught to all new medical students and therefore repeated by them once they are qualified. The truth is that there is more than adequate historical evidence proving that vaccination did not eradicate the so-called infectious diseases, including smallpox.

Secondly, and possibly more importantly, ‘germs’ do not cause disease and so they cannot possibly spread disease. Professor Antoine Bechamp proved over 150 years ago that it is not an external ‘germ’ but the body’s environment that is key to health or lack of it.

Also, flu is not a contagious disease, the symptoms of ‘flu’ are a process of elimination of toxins, a fact that has been discovered and used by many medical practitioners for the benefit of their patients for many generations.

And finally, wild birds can also become ill by being poisoned from eating foods contaminated by chemical toxins, nothing is ‘spread’ either within the bird populations nor across to the human population.

In short, you need to make sure you have unbiased information so that you can make a properly informed decision about whether to accept or reject vaccinations of any kind.

Posted in Vaccination | Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton’s Hypocrisy

It would appear that we have been treated to another example of biased reporting lately.

A few days ago there was a major news story that occurred in America but seems to have been overlooked by the mainstream media.

Why?

Probably because it is a source of major embarrassment, or should be, to Hillary Clinton at the very least.

In an address calling for internet freedom around the world, she condemned the Egyptian and Iranian governments for arresting and beating protestors.

During her speech a 71 year old US Army veteran and former CIA analyst stood up, displaying his Veterans for Peace T-shirt, and turned his back on her in silent protest of America’s foreign policy.

As a result of his non-violent protest he was beaten and arrested.

Her speech is all about freedom of speech but it is pure rhetoric because she does not hesitate a moment in her delivery nor bat an eyelid when Mr McGovern is forcibly removed from the room.

I want to call it ironic, which Ray McGovern does, but it is not irony, it is hypocrisy.

Because you will probably not know about this story, it can be viewed here: http://www.democracynow.org/2011/2/18/ex_cia_analyst_ray_mcgovern_beaten

And a further article about this event not being covered by the mainstream media can be accessed here: http://open.salon.com/blog/redpossum/2011/02/17/hilarys_hypocrisy

The news media should be our eyes and ears onto the world, because we cannot be everywhere at all times to investigate ourselves what is happening; we have to rely on the media to provide us with unbiased information.

What the mainstream media actually provides for us is a very different story, literally, because it delivers very biased information.

This is a major Freedom of Speech issue. Politicians must not forget that they represent ‘we the people’ and that they must not make speeches full of impressive words but empty of action.

Additionally it is the duty of the press to keep a watchful eye on such activity and report it back to us, which in itself would be a useful deterrent against empty rhetoric from politicians.

Posted in Freedom of Speech, Media Failure | Leave a comment

An Unscientific Study

A rather bizarre report has just surfaced in the news suggesting that vegetables grown non-organically taste better and have more nutrients than their organic counterparts.

Having made such a sweeping statement, the small print then mentions, as if in passing, that it was a small-scale trial and involved only 3 vegetables.

Worryingly this report comes from the apparently trustworthy British consumer magazine, Which.

According to Emma Hockridge, head of policy at the Soil Association, who insisted the findings were not significant and described the Which? research as “irresponsible”:
“This is an unscientific study of an extremely limited sample of vegetables”.

I would like to know who was behind this report and exactly how the vegetables were grown, both ‘organically’ and ‘non-organically’, before even considering this as an honest comparison, because quite frankly this counters all other known information about the greater nutritional value of organically grown produce.

It is well known how studies can be ‘skewed’ in favour of the biased view of the person initiating and reporting the results of such a study and therefore I have to wonder what is behind such a report.

Without wishing to promote what may seem to be a cynical view, this seems, however, to be an appropriate point to remind you that Codex Alimentarius will be implemented shortly. If you are not aware of Codex and what it means, please refer to our blog entry on this topic, The Silent Stalker of Your Health Freedom, as it contains links to a video you can watch and to reports you can download.

As I mentioned in that blog, this piece of legislation will take away our right to choose organic food and so what better way to support this legislation, than to tell us that organic food is not more nutritious than inorganic food after all.

There is a significant point that needs to be made, which is that the health of the soil itself is key to the nutritional value of the produce.

The nutrients in the earth generally have been depleted over the course of the past century or so due to a variety of reasons, toxic chemical overload being probably the most pernicious. Therefore it is of vital importance that the soil in which plants are grown is maintained or fed with all the ingredients it requires, natural ingredients of course not chemicals, in order for optimum nutrients to be present when the plants produce their fruits.

There are far too many unanswered questions about this report to consider it noteworthy, but the weight of the evidence in favour of more naturally grown produce being better for us nutritionally far outweighs any evidence to the contrary.

And the more nutrients the produce contains, the better it is for our health.

Posted in Health Freedom, Healthy Food | Leave a comment

The Silent Stalker of Your Health Freedom

You’ve probably never heard of Codex Alimentarius; and that’s just the way certain vested interest groups want it to be.

If you have heard of it and think it’s just some obscure law about herbs and supplements that doesn’t really matter, then you couldn’t be further from the truth.

Why?

Because Codex Alimentarius is actually a means of eroding some of your liberties in ways that are not obvious.

According to the National Health Federation, the aims and objectives of Codex Alimentarius are as follows:
– Only low-potency, “me too” supplements available that will do nothing for your health.
– All or most foods genetically-modified.
– Beneficial supplements unavailable or sold by prescription only.

Even if you don’t take supplements, the little phrase “All or most foods genetically modified” should make you angry!

When this is fully implemented in Europe on May 1st this year, you will be denied many rights that you currently have.

These include the right to use herbal remedies, the choice not only of GM or non-GM foods but also the option to choose organic foods, because foods will no longer be labelled, which will leave you with no idea about the origin and contents of the foods you’ll be buying.

According to the USA, GMOs are substantially equivalent to non-GMOs, which is an outrageous proposition! And dangerous too!

For those of us who care about what we eat; what we put both in and on our bodies – which should be every single one of us – then this whole legislation is an outrage.

To find out more:

You can view a full documentary presentation by Ian Crane, called Codex Alimentarius, from our video page http://www.howtobenaturallyhealthy.com/video.htm

You can download a handout by the National Health Federation HERE.

You can also download a recent press release by the Alliance for Natural Health HERE and find out more about this Organisation from this link http://www.anhinternational.org/

Or if you live in the USA use this link http://anh-usa.org/
The link to their page on Codex Alimentarius is http://www.anh-usa.org/campaigns/codex-international-standards/

Posted in Health Freedom | Leave a comment

To be or not to be vaccinated, that is the question!!

I regularly see reports in the mainstream media that we should be vaccinated against an ever growing number of diseases. However, there is, and has been since the introduction of the practice of vaccination, a large number of medical practitioners who advise that we should not be vaccinated.

Unfortunately, you will rarely find the recommendations of this latter group published by the mainstream media.

You can download a Report HERE that will tell you what these medical practitioners say about the vaccination industry and the valid reasons why their best advice is to refuse vaccinations.

Although short, this report is very precise in its message, and states quite categorically that ‘health cannot come through a needle’.

It also exposes the failings of the mainstream medical establishment in this controversy, that they are not trained to look to vaccines as a cause of ill-health. In fact it’s quite the reverse, they are actively encouraged to vaccinate. By whom? By the industry that sells them the vaccines in the first place.

The report is written from an American perspective, but the essential points it makes are valid for all of us no matter where we live.

It’s a sad fact that ‘medicine’ is not a science, it’s an industry; an industry generated from Big Pharma that has our ill-health, not our good health, at its heart. For it is only by keeping us as lifelong ‘consumers’ that they continue to be Big.

Dr Vernon Coleman makes the point succinctly when he says:

“In the last century the practice of medicine has become no more than an adjunct to the pharmaceutical industry and the other aspects of the huge, powerful and immensely profitable health care industry. Medicine is no longer an independent profession. Doctors have become nothing more than a link connecting the pharmaceutical industry to the consumer.”

Why don’t we hear about this in the mainstream media? Good question, but one that requires its own blog entry to do justice to the topic.

No doubt the controversy will continue, at least until the time that enough of us say ‘no’ to vaccinations; then the industry will have to sit up and listen to us.

Posted in Vaccination | Leave a comment