How Overfed and Underfed Children Can Both Be Malnourished

Posted on December 6, 2011 by NoR

I recently listened to Webster Griffin Tarpley’s broadcast of 26 November 2011 about his recent trip to Syria. You can find the broadcast on his website.

I do not intend to discuss the political content, although it is interesting, but to focus on 2 non-political points that he makes.

The first is that, whatever else you may think about the regime in that country, Webster says that in Syria no child goes to bed hungry.

That is indeed a great claim, for the same cannot be said about the so-called affluent ‘western’ countries, including America, the UK and no doubt most other countries, where many millions of children live below the poverty-line.

The second point he makes is that the reason no child goes to bed hungry is because bread is heavily subsidised.

Now this is not the processed rubbish bread that is made with refined flour and various chemicals added as ‘preservatives’ that is so prolific in the supermarkets of the ‘west’. According to Webster’s report, the Syrian loaf is 2.2lb, or 1kg, is freshly made from wholegrains with seeds and costs about 20 American cents, based on the conversion rate that prevailed while he was there.

As I said this is not a political blog. It is also not intended just to highlight world child poverty. Having mentioned child poverty though, I must point out that according to a current advertising campaign to raise funds UNICEF plans to end child poverty by 2015. But donating to UNICEF, good idea though it sounds, will not end the plight of the poor children of the world because they intend to vaccinate them all. If you are a regular reader of this blog you will know that the evidence shows that vaccinations will not end their ill-health, on the contrary, they will exacerbate it and cause further suffering and deaths.

My intention here is to highlight the misperception about the word ‘malnutrition’.

It is usually used in the context of being underfed. This is incorrect, because even the dictionary defines it as ‘lack of proper nutrition’.

The people who are helping to fight hunger in the very poor countries that have severely malnourished babies and young children use a product called ‘ready to use therapeutic food’.

What is this ‘ready to use therapeutic food’? I discovered that it is a paste-like product that contains 4 basic ingredients, one of which is sugar! Another ingredient is ‘vitamin and mineral supplement’, which sounded encouraging until I looked further at its nutritional composition.

At first glance the list of nutrients is impressive, unless you are aware of the importance of certain essential nutrients and then you realise that the makers of these products do not really understand the importance of proper nutrition.

The vitamin C content of only 50mg per 100g is woefully inadequate as is the magnesium content. They are both essential nutrients that have been proved to be highly efficacious, but in far larger quantities than are in this paste, even if the children eat a number of these packs.

Vitamin C is a crucial enzyme. It is one that humans, unlike most other animals, do not manufacture in their bodies and therefore require it from their diet. Although not suffering from scurvy as such, many people suffer symptoms of sub-clinical scurvy resulting from an inadequate intake of Vitamin C.

Magnesium is an extremely important element in many functions of the body and magnesium deficiency also creates a vast number of symptoms of ill-health.

What is conspicuous by its absence in the ‘ready to use therapeutic food’ programme is fresh produce.

The importance of fresh food, meaning fruit and vegetables not processed packaged products, is a vital aspect of any programme that genuinely wants to ‘end poverty’ and bring health to the children, and adults, of these areas.

The idea that underfed children are malnourished is easily understood; what may seem more difficult to acknowledge is that many millions of children in the more affluent ‘west’ also go to bed malnourished, although not necessarily underfed.

How can I say that, you may ask. This is not a questions of semantics and the answer lies in understanding the difference between quantity and quality.

It is the issue that lies at the heart of understanding the function of nutrition and indeed the nature of illness.

The problem arises because medical education includes very little, if any, training in nutrition. So how is a doctor able to recognise, let alone treat malnutrition? Mainstream medical training is based on finding ‘disease’, then killing the ‘germ’ that caused the disease. This leads to the concept that even though the drugs are known to be toxic they will kill the ‘germ’, but not, as long as they are given the right dose, kill the patient at the same time!

The argument could be used if, and only if, ‘germs’ were the cause of disease. The evidence clearly shows otherwise, which makes this concept wrong on every level.

With a proper understanding of nutrition and the ill-health that results from a lack of proper nutrition, you can understand that the problem of malnutrition goes much further than those who do not have enough to eat.

Whilst it may seem controversial, even people who are obese can be included in the category of suffering from malnutrition. They clearly do not suffer from lack of ‘stuff to eat’; I won’t call it ‘food’, because the real meaning of food means that which nourishes and a great deal of what passes for ‘food’ these days does not have the ability to nourish an ant let alone a growing human child.

To add to the ‘malnutrition’ that is caused by processed, sugar-laden, salt-laden, chemical-laden ‘stuff’ that is referred to as ‘food’, there is also the toxic nature of such substances. The toxins they contain include refined sugar, processed table salt and aspartame as well as chemicals that are used as flavourings, colourings and preservatives.

Only by returning to consumption of ‘real food’ can we ever hope to understand what it means to be healthy.

This is of particular importance to anyone who is on the path to regaining their health, whether from a serious illness or accident or recovering from the ill-effects of a course of pharmaceutical drugs.

There is plenty of advice about the need to build up the ‘immune system’, which certainly needs to be bolstered. However, it is not just the immune system, it is the whole body that requires rebuilding.

The human body is a self-regulating organism, and as such it is capable of rebuilding its own healthy status; it just requires the appropriate ingredients to achieve this. Those ingredients are available from Nature, grown without chemicals and in nutrient-rich soil.

As Hippocrates said “Let your food be your medicine”.

You can learn more about how to be naturally healthy in our book, Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill and Drugs Can’t Cure You.

Other useful links
Webster Tarpley’s website HERE

Information about Vitamin C HERE

Information about magnesium deficiency HERE

Posted in Health, Healthy Food, Human Rights, Malnutrition, Media Failure, Nutrition, Politics, Science, Vaccination, World Crisis | 1 Comment

How You Can Help To Solve the World Crisis

Posted on November 15, 2011 by NoR

Our world is in turmoil.

Most of our major systems are in serious trouble; especially finance, politics, health, education and the media.

Fortunately, there are solutions to all the problems that we are facing.

However, only by knowing the true history of the problems are we able to avoid repeating it. An appropriate quote usually attributed to Einstein is that “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

Therefore we need to find a different way to solve these problems, which means that we must take responsibility and take action. We must stop relying on those in the positions of power to find the solutions for us; for they are the cause of the problems we are experiencing.

In order to take action, you need to be informed.

Unfortunately, because the corporate-controlled mainstream media is part of the problem, you are not being properly served by them and therefore it is unwise to rely on them as your sole source of news and information.

We at NoR can assist you in your quest for knowledge. We are an independent organisation with the aim of providing you with access to the information you require so that you can make informed decisions.

We produce websites with material in a variety of media on a number of extremely important topics, including books and blog entries we have written and videos produced by other filmmakers to which we provide links.

We plan to keep researching and writing, both blogs and books, and to continue expanding our areas of research, including sourcing and collating material so that you can find it all in one place, on our websites.

But in order to do this, we need your help.

However we are not asking you for donations.

We are asking you to buy our books, currently available as paperbacks or Kindle downloads. Or if you have already purchased them, we thank you and ask you to encourage others to buy them.

By purchasing our books you will not only support the continuation of our work but you will be buying invaluable material that will benefit you in all aspects of your life, throughout your life.

You can find more information about our books on our two main websites.

The main NoR website presents our book ‘The Nature of Reality: Exploding the Mind, Body, Spirit Myth’, including a summary of each of the 9 modules contained in the book.

This book explains our statement that ‘reality is far stranger than you can imagine’.

The greatest and most profound mystery that you could ever wish to contemplate is the nature of reality.

In order to make sense of your experiences, both personally and those of the world you live in, you need to know about the true nature of reality. Compelling as the ‘materialist’ view of reality may seem, it simply is not supported by true scientific evidence.

Our book will completely change your view of who you think you are, what life really is and what you can do to change your experiences.

NoR’s companion website, ‘How To Be Naturally Healthy’, presents our book, ‘Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill and Drugs Can’t Cure You’.

In this book you will discover that, contrary to the messages that are issued from the mainstream medical establishment through the corporate-controlled mainstream media, illness is not an inevitable consequence of life and true health is not brought about through the use of pharmaceutical products.

The statement that ‘this book can save your life’ is no idle claim about ‘Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill and Drugs Can’t Cure You’.

It is a book that will provide you with essential information about how to gain real health for you and your family. True health-care for all cannot be attained under the current mainstream medical paradigm as it is based on a faulty concept of ‘health’ and controlled by the profit-oriented pharmaceutical industry.

Our website also contains links to some very interesting free videos as well as our blog, which covers a variety of topics with a special emphasis on health.

We are sure that both our books will help you understand how to gain independence and autonomy over all aspects of your life.

This is why we are asking you to please help us promote our work, which you can do using any or all of the following methods:

a) Send emails with a link to our websites to anyone and everyone you know, family, friends and colleagues.

b) Post our websites on your Facebook profile.

c) Tweet about us and our work.

d) Share links to the videos with friends, family and colleagues.

e) Share links to our blogs with friends, family and colleagues.

f) Buy our books and recommend them to everyone you know.

We are living in a time of great upheaval, where control over your life is being taken away from you, so it is vitally important that we all work together to take back the control and to bring about the changes that are needed to make our world a better place for us all.

Please do not think that you are unable to do very much and therefore you do not need to do anything; every action, however small, has its effect.

Now is not the time for inertia, now is the time for action!

As Thomas Paine said:
“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives everything its value.”

We thank you.

NoR

Our websites are:
The Nature of Reality www.thenatureofreality.com
How To Be Naturally Healthy www.howtobenaturallyhealthy.com

Posted in Education, Freedom of Speech, Health, Health Freedom, Human Rights, Media Failure, Politics, Science, World Crisis | Leave a comment

How You Can Avoid Cancer

Posted on October 30, 2011 by NoR

As I write this it is approaching the end of October, which is often referred to as ‘Breast Cancer Awareness’ month and used as a vast marketing tool for the ‘mainstream medical establishment’ to browbeat women to ‘get themselves checked’. And in case men feel left out, November is ‘Prostate Cancer Awareness’ month with the same browbeating purpose.

This blog is not just about breast cancer or prostate cancer, it is about all forms of this most dreaded disease, but the shameless marketing in October and November highlights the industry’s lack of genuine care about your health.

All regular readers of this blog will know that I am not a fan of the mainstream medical establishment and so you will not be surprised that I look to other, more trustworthy health media outlets for news about health. I must state for the record that I applaud anyone who is promoting truly healthy lifestyle options and so this blog is not critical of these websites per se.

However, as the subject of cancer is predominant this month I have viewed 2 of the most popular ‘non-mainstream’ health websites for their comments on this very important health topic.

Mike Adams of Natural News featured an interview at the Burzynski Institute, where they have reported great success with gene-based, non-toxic treatments for certain cancers. However, despite the reported success of their treatments, Dr Stanislaw Burzynski has been villified and almost imprisoned for his pioneering work.

Dr Mercola featured on his website an interview of Dr Cedric F Garland, who stated that only 10% of cancers are genetic and who advocates the use of Vitamin D as a cure for breast cancer.

So, does this mean that Dr Burzynski can only treat 10% of cancers? Does it also mean that Vitamin D can only cure breast cancer?

What about all the other cancers? What about all the other successful treatments and cures? But, more importantly, what about prevention?

As I said, I applaud both of these websites because I know that their work has educated many people about health and about the failures of the ‘mainstream medical establishment’ and their websites do contain other information about cancer.

However, the fundamental question for everyone who is concerned about their health has to be; what can I do to ‘avoid’ this most dreadful and dreaded disease?

Surprisingly, the answer is simple, in order to avoid cancer you must be ‘healthy’. Whether you succumb to cancer is not a matter of ‘luck’, nor is it a matter of your genes; it really is a question of being healthy.

By this I mean truly healthy, which, contrary to the ‘mainstream medical’ view, does not mean merely the absence of disease or disease symptoms.

In fact, disease is not an ‘entity’ to be fought and destroyed, which is why the current ‘mainstream medical establishment’ view is incorrect and why they will never ‘win’ the war on cancer when they insist on ‘fighting disease’ especially with toxic substances.

This attitude of ‘fighting disease’ is a fundamental problem for the ‘mainstream medical establishment’ and a far-reaching one that includes the training undertaken by all medical students.

According to the late Dr Robert Mendelsohn MD,
“Medical school does its best to turn smart students stupid, honest students corrupt and healthy students sick. It isn’t very hard to turn a smart student into a stupid one. First of all, the admissions people make sure the professors will get weak-willed, authority-abiding students to work on. Then they give them a curriculum that is absolutely meaningless as far as healing or health are concerned.”

A shocking indictment indeed from a highly successful doctor who is not alone in this view of medical school training. Nor is he alone in being a medically-trained doctor who subsequently rejected the mainstream methods when he realised that they were not only ineffective but that many of them were actually harmful.

This indictment highlights the issues I have raised in all my blog posts about health and continue here on the subject of cancer.

In reference to a routine visit to your local doctor, Dr Mendelsohn offered the following advice:
“I don’t advise anyone who has no symptoms to go to the doctor for a physical examination. For people with symptoms, it’s not such a good idea, either. The entire diagnostic procedure — from the moment you enter the office to the moment you leave clutching a prescription or a referral appointment — is a seldom useful ritual.”

This advice applies to the ‘ritual’ for detecting breast cancer. Every year, and especially in October, women are frightened into accepting mammography as a proper diagnostic technique and submitting themselves for their annual check.

But how many of these women who are subjected to this ‘diagnostic’ are aware that it has been recognised for many decades throughout the scientific community that repeated x-rays are more likely to cause the very cancer they are purported to detect?

Where is this vital piece of evidence in the vast promotion for ‘breast cancer awareness’?

The cancer epidemic is approaching a 50% incidence rate; meaning that either you or your partner seems likely to be stricken by this ‘disease’.

It is prevention that must now be given full priority.

‘Prevention’ requires you to be aware of everything that you put both in and on your body, which means that you need to know what substances are carcinogenic so that you can avoid products that contain such carcinogens, or to be more precise, toxins.

There is a huge body of scientific literature on the subject of carcinogens. The leading light in this field is Dr Samuel S Epstein, M.D., who is the internationally recognised authority on the toxic and carcinogenic effects of environmental pollutants in air, water, and the workplace, and of ingredients and contaminants in consumer products – food, cosmetics and household products.

It is a gross failing of any government that allows industrial processes without safety studies being conducted on the chemicals used, but it is a category of negligence into which most governments fall. This is a topic so vast that it deserves a whole blog of its own, because it not only requires a discussion of the huge number of untested chemicals already in our environment, it also introduces the controversial subject of ‘testing’, which usually means animal testing or vivisection.

Included in Dr Epstein’s great body of work is the evidence that regular mammography increases the risk of breast cancer as well as being of dubious benefit, if any, for women who regularly receive this radiation. It is, of course, of great benefit for the industry that promotes it, because it greatly boosts their income.

More information on toxic substances can be found on the website of Dr Samuel Epstein HERE and from his many books.

Prevention means taking proper care of yourself and your body, which requires you to understand the real nature of ‘symptoms’; how they occur, what they mean and what to do about them; and to know that ‘health’ is not just absence of disease symptoms.

Sadly, you will not find the answers to the questions about cancer prevention from a visit to your mainstream-medically-trained local doctor’s surgery.

In the words of Dr Vernon Coleman, MB ChB DSc:
“In the last century the practice of medicine has become no more than an adjunct to the pharmaceutical industry and the other aspects of the huge, powerful and immensely profitable health care industry. Medicine is no longer an independent profession. Doctors have become nothing more than a link connecting the pharmaceutical industry to the consumer.”

Many doctors are genuine in their care and concern for their patients, which is why an increasing number of them are discovering for themselves that the ‘mainstream’ method they were taught at medical school does not work to improve the health of their patients.

An example of such a doctor was the late Dr Henry Bieler M.D., who based his classic book, Food is Your Best Medicine, on years of experimental and observational evidence that commenced with his experience when his own health suffered. In the Introduction to his book he states,
“I began to re-examine an old, old medical truism – that nature does the real healing……….. Under the proper conditions nature, if given the opportunity, is always the greatest healer.”

At the beginning of the 21st century you are faced with an even greater barrage of toxins than 50 years ago when Dr Bieler wrote his book, so, in order to give your body the proper conditions for nature to work, you need to be much more vigilant about all aspects of your life and how everything has the potential to impact your health.

To provide ‘nature’ with the ‘proper conditions to work’ requires you to take full responsibility for your own health and to take the appropriate actions to enable you to live a very full, healthy and cancer-free life.

Our book, Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill and Drugs Can’t Cure You, will provide you with what you need in order to understand what makes you ill, how to return to health and how to stay naturally healthy.

Posted in Cancer, Freedom of Speech, Health, Health Freedom, Healthy Food, Media Failure, Nutrition, Science | 1 Comment

More Media Lies About HIV

Posted on October 19, 2011 by NoR

The BBC have done it again! They are disseminating propaganda as if it were news and unfortunately it is the lack of ‘science’ behind their ‘news’ that is causing real harm.

To explain, a story has recently emerged about 3 women who have died, supposedly as a result of stopping their HIV medication in order to let God heal them.

The first paragraph of this story reads, “At least three people in London with HIV have died after they stopped taking life saving drugs on the advice of their Evangelical Christian pastors.”

This is wrong on a number of levels, but in this blog I shall only deal with 2 of them, the ‘placebo effect’ and ‘HIV infection’.

Firstly, the placebo effect is widely known throughout the medical establishment as it is part of their ‘control’ mechanism for testing the efficacy of new treatments; in fact the double-blind, placebo-controlled study is regarded as their ‘gold standard’.

It is also well-known that during a double-blind, placebo-controlled study many participants in the placebo group will experience some improvement in their symptoms, which is interesting considering that they have only been taking a sugar pill.

Furthermore, and less widely known, there is the phenomenon of ‘spontaneous remission’, which refers to the complete disappearance of a ‘disease’ without any treatment at all.

It is clear that there is a proportion of the population who are able to improve their condition without the use of pharmaceutical products.

These results from the placebo effect and spontaneous remission prove the well-known phenomenon of the power of your mind, or the power of your beliefs.

There is a great deal of scientific evidence to support this phenomenon, which is ignored by the medical establishment for obvious reasons as it questions the need for the pharmaceutical industry.

The reason that everyone does not have the same response to placebos is quite simply that people have different belief systems. This may provide an explanation to the question of why some of the people mentioned in the BBC story were ‘cured’ and others were not.

The power of beliefs is explained more fully in our work on The Nature Of Reality, which you can access by clicking HERE

The other element of the story is the problem with ‘HIV infection’ and the concept of the ‘life saving drugs’.

Quite simply, truly unbiased, scientific evidence proves that HIV is not a pathogen, therefore it cannot ‘infect’ anyone, and more to the point it cannot kill anyone.

You may find that this statement challenges everything you have heard about HIV and AIDS, but that does not make it false.

It is an example of another piece of scientific evidence that is suppressed because it is not in the best interests of the pharmaceutical industry and is therefore kept from the general public by a largely compliant and uncritical mainstream media.

Most drugs should only be stopped under professional supervision and with a regimen of reduced dosages that taper off over time, because people can suffer from powerful ‘withdrawal effects’ from drugs, which can be dramatic and even fatal, something that is not mentioned in the BBC article.

It is quite possible that the 3 people who died fall into this category. But whether this is what happened in this case is not explained in the article and, without further investigation, is only speculation, however it is a point worth making. It is also worth noting that these points are not mentioned in the BBC article, which a really ‘balanced’ report would have mentioned; another example of the very biased reporting by the mainstream media.

What are more likely causes for these deaths are the toxic drugs that were prescribed for them in combination with other toxins that had accumulated in their bodies from food, water and the environment.

The BBC article ends with the following:
‘The recent House of Lords committee report into HIV awareness said faith groups’ approaches to supporting people with HIV had improved but more needed to be done.
“It is essential that faith leaders engage with HIV as an issue and provide effective and truthful support and communication around the subject,” it said.’

This would be laughable if only it were not so desperately tragic.

It is the mainstream medical industry and the mainstream media that do not provide ‘truthful support and communication’ about HIV. It is time that THEY were truthful about the issue so that people stop dying as a result of their lies.

It is definitely time to ‘provide effective and truthful support and communication around the subject’ of HIV once and for all. It is time that they took note of the real scientific evidence instead of the demands of the pharmaceutical industry.

If you would like more in depth information on the real story concerning the virus known as HIV, I heartily recommend Dr Peter Duesberg’s book, ‘Inventing the AIDS Virus’; the title says it all. This book should be an essential part of the reading list of every medical student, except it won’t be whilst the pharmaceutical industry is in charge of medical training.

If you would like to know more about the problem with the ‘germ theory’ and why germs do not make you ill, please read our book, which you can access from the link HERE

Posted in Freedom of Speech, Health Freedom, HIV and AIDS, Human Rights, Media Failure, Science | Leave a comment

Why The Official 911 Story is a Conspiracy Theory Not a Conspiracy Fact

Posted on September 18, 2011 by NoR

In an earlier blog I wrote ” The events of that day have implications not only for the people of New York and not only for Americans; they have implications for absolutely everyone, wherever you live.”

I want to develop this point about the wider implications, because of their vital importance to each and every one of us in the world today.

There is currently a great deal of talk about ‘conspiracy theories’. Therefore it is very important to know the real definition of ‘conspiracy theory’ to be able to apply this definition to any item of ‘news’ that includes a reference to them.

The dictionary defines a ‘conspiracy’ as ‘a surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons’.

A ‘theory’ is an idea put forward until it is either proved or disproved, or, as the dictionary states, ‘a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural’.

Unfortunately, the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ has now been effectively ‘hijacked’ in order to be used in a highly derogatory sense to label anyone who does not believe the official story on whatever topic is under discussion.

Whilst this may appear to be just an issue of name-calling, there is a very real and dangerous undertone to this matter.

The whole topic of ‘conspiracy theories’ has raised its level of importance recently as a result of the forthcoming election in the United States and the characters involved in Obama’s re-election campaign.

In 2008, Cass Sunstein, who is head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the current Obama administration, co-authored a paper called ‘Conspiracy Theories’. Whilst it purports to discuss conspiracy theories in general, it specifically names the events of 9/11 as a recent example.

The paper makes the very clear point that only those who do NOT believe that 9/11 was carried out by al-Qaeda are conspiracy theorists and states that “Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories”.

As many other commentators on 9/11 have pointed out, the official story of the events of 9/11 is a ‘conspiracy theory’, because Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were quoted as being the perpetrators of the attacks before any investigation was carried out. Therefore the official story from the very beginning is a ‘proposed explanation of a plan formulated by two or more people’.

In other words, the official story is the epitome of a ‘conspiracy theory’, using the very definition put forward by Cass Sunstein and his co-author Adrian Vermeule, and is supported by many people who will not be persuaded by the vast amount of evidence that clearly dispels their theory.

Unfortunately for their argument their ‘theory’ has yet to be proved, beyond reasonable doubt. However, this lack of proof to support their theory does not seem to worry them.

And this is precisely the crux of the problem, because it is the supporters of the official story who currently hold the positions of power, and not just power within the United States, which is why this is not just an issue for Americans. And it is precisely these people in the positions of power, who are perpetuating the so-called ‘war on terror’, who are holding on to the official story, aided and abetted by a compliant corporate-controlled mainstream media.

Because there is still a great deal of information that is unavailable, it is not possible to know exactly who are the perpetrators of the events of that day. What is clear from the evidence is that certain aspects of the official story are ‘physically impossible’.

It is therefore imperative that everyone looks at the vast amount of incontrovertible evidence that supports the stance that al-Qaeda, as portrayed in the media, could not possibly have carried out the 9/11 attacks. Once you have studied the evidence, it is extremely likely that you will also not agree with the official story, or at least have very grave doubts about it.

It is for this reason that everyone must become aware of the reasons why the official story is a lie and join the growing numbers of people who are calling for a new and truly independent investigation into the events of that day.

The importance of this issue cannot be overstated because of the consequences of allowing the real perpetrators of 9/11, whoever they are, to continue in positions of power where they can continue to erode our rights and freedoms as embodied in the UN International Declaration of Human Rights. If you do not have a copy of this important document, you can download it from HERE

Please read this document and understand how these very rights are being taken away from us in the name of the phony ‘war on terror’, which has been rightly renamed as the ‘war of terror’. These are inalienable rights that belong to us as human beings and should not be allowed to be overridden under any circumstances.

The people in the governments of the world should have these rights in the forefront of their minds when considering their policies. These elected officials should also be accountable to the people who elected them and a truly independent media should be the ‘watchdogs’ reporting to the people. With this system in place, we can be in a position to hold governments to account for their actions and be able to stop them from taking actions that are against the wishes of the people; including the action of initiating wars that contravene international law as well as the articles embodied in the Declaration of Human Rights.

It is not my intention, however, to discuss in this blog the illegalities of the wars that have been waged in the name of the ‘war on terror’.

What is important is to understand that the stated purpose of these wars is not their real purpose, which becomes apparent when you investigate the whole issue and uncover the historical evidence of the many ‘false flag’ events that have occurred; you will also discover the connections that various governments and secret service agencies have with these ‘terrorist’ organisations.

What then becomes apparent is that we must not let ourselves be terrorised into living in fear of terrorists, because they do not exist in the way they are purported to exist.

But most of all, we cannot sit back and do nothing, because that way we allow those who seek to control us to ‘win’.

The most important part you can play is to educate yourself about the events of 9/11, if you have not already done so, then please pass the message on to everyone you know.

When a sufficiently large percentage of people know that the official story IS the ‘conspiracy theory’, we can start to realise that we need different people in the positions of power; people who understand that the role of ‘government’ is to carry out the wishes of the people and who are therefore accountable to us, which of course means that if they fail to carry out the appropriate policies, they can be removed from office.

In addition to having the right people in ‘government’, we also need the right people in the media, so that they will do what they are supposed to do, which is to investigate and report the news, honestly and with integrity, which they are currently failing to do; but that is the subject of another blog.

Posted in 911, Freedom of Speech, Human Rights, Media Failure | Leave a comment

Why The Official 911 Story is a Lie

Posted on August 30, 2011 by NoR

If you only obtain your news from mainstream sources, you are probably still under the impression that the tragic events of September 11th 2001 were the work of 19 terrorists who hijacked 4 planes. They then expertly flew those planes, deliberately crashing 2 of them into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre in New York and crashing another plane into the Pentagon after an extremely expert manoeuvre. The hijackers of the 4th plane were somehow overpowered by the passengers and crew but still subsequently crashed into a muddy field in Pennsylvania.

If you believe this is the true story of the events of that day, and many people still do believe it, it may be a real shock to you to learn that nothing could be further from the truth.

Whilst all the details about the events of that day are still not fully known, what IS known is that the official story promulgated by the U.S. and other governments via the world mainstream media, and most recently by the BBC, is most definitely not true.

The statement that ‘the official story is not true’ is based on vast amounts of evidence and leads to the inevitable conclusion that if the official story is a lie, there must be a different story.

But, before you shout ‘conspiracy theory’, please read below a small sample of the compelling evidence for this view:

1. The collapse of the Twin Towers due to fires alone is ‘physically impossible’, according to expert scientists, especially as
a) the Towers were designed to withstand the impact of a large plane and
b) the steel frames were certified to have been easily able to withstand fires caused by burning jet fuel without collapsing.

2. All three WTC building collapses reveal many features of controlled demolition, in addition to this fact there are a large number of witnesses who heard explosions in various parts of each of the buildings before they collapsed.

3. All three Towers collapsed at almost free-fall speed as if there was no resistance from the thousands of tons of structure below. This also is physically impossible, except in the circumstances that the resistance was removed by controlled demolition.

A further problem arises from the speedy ‘Ground Zero cleanup’ operation, which cleared away and sold off large amounts of the steel from the Towers before it could be examined, effectively removing evidence from a crime scene. This begs the question, why was crucial forensic evidence removed so quickly?

Amongst the debris that was collected by various people even before the ‘cleanup’ there was sufficient evidence of explosive materials that has been identified as such by experts, many of whom belong to the ’911 truth movement’.

This vast 911 truth movement includes a great number of highly qualified architects, engineers, physicists and other professionals who have studied the evidence and have been convinced that such evidence not only does not support the official story but that it quite clearly supports the story of an ‘inside job’.

Some people, David Ray Griffin in particular, have studied the 911 Commission Report and found it full of errors and omissions. Others, Dr Steven Jones in particular, have studied the NIST Report and found that its conclusion of ‘fires plus impact damage’ being responsible for the collapse of the Towers is not supported by the evidence. Dr Jones, amongst others, has conducted several experiments to support his controlled-demolition hypothesis.

As the evidence proves, the Twin Towers and WTC7 were brought down by controlled demolitions that were very carefully planned and executed. This type of operation would have taken months to organise.

The main thrust of the 911 truth movement is to force a new investigation; but this time an investigation that is truly independent; one that will look at all of the evidence; one that will listen to all the witness testimonies and one that will not start from the assumption that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda terrorists were responsible.

The new investigation must answer questions that the 911 Commission Report avoided or ignored. Among the questions to be answered are:
What really happened on September 11th 2001?
Who was responsible for the events of that day and the deaths of over 3000 people?
Who were the alleged ‘hijackers’?
Were the planes hijacked at all? If they were not, what really happened to those planes and their passengers?
If Osama bin Laden died in December 2001, who was the person impersonating him in the ‘videos’ supposedly claiming responsibility?
Was this another ‘false flag’ attack designed to initiate a ‘war on terror’ in order for an elite group within the US to implement their already stated aims encapsulated within the document by PNAC called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, calling for ‘A New Pearl Harbor’?

The events of that day have implications not only for the people of New York and not only for Americans; they have implications for absolutely everyone, wherever you live.

Whilst it is important that you make up your own mind, you cannot make an informed decision if you do not have all the information you need to make that informed decision.

Therefore it is important to familiarise yourself with the evidence, no matter how the mainstream media choose to refute such evidence, however, please be aware that what I have listed in this blog is only a very small sample of the evidence that is available.

If, like many thousands of other people around the world, you view the evidence and are convinced that it proves the official story is a lie, please send a link to this blog to everyone you know.

There is no ‘war on terrorism’; it is a war on our freedom. We have a right to our freedom; we must not allow our freedom to be taken away from us.

If you are new to this information, or if you are aware of it but you wish to know more, the following websites will be extremely useful as they have been set up by some of the professionals referred to and contain plenty of information that you will not find in the mainstream media.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://www.911truth.org/

Additionally, please watch the preview to a new documentary from the link HERE

Posted in 911, Freedom of Speech, Human Rights, Media Failure, Science | Leave a comment

Your Human Rights are Being Abused

Posted on August 11, 2011 by NoR

Abuse of Human Rights is something that you probably tend to think of as something that happens in ‘other countries’; something that happens in ‘Third World’ countries when dictators take over and install repressive regimes.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Because, the sad truth is that we are all suffering from our Human Rights being abused, no matter where we live.

If you think this is an exaggeration, I would ask if you are actually aware of your human rights as codified in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948?

If not, please download and read this 2-page document; it is essential reading as it embodies the natural ‘code’ by which we should all live. Download from the link HERE

Whatever else the United Nations may do, especially the Security Council, the Declaration of Human Rights is the most important work they have ever done.

It also embodies the essence of the Declaration of Independence as stated by Thomas Jefferson:

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness –That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…”

Wherever you live, it is quite likely that your rights are being eroded, especially, but not exclusively, under the guise of both ‘the war on terror’ and the ‘banking crisis’.

I am claiming my right under Article 19 of the Declaration of Human Rights to my freedom of expression to tell you that both the ‘war on terror’ and ‘the banking crisis’ are based on lies.

The ‘war’ is in fact a war to erode our rights and effectively ‘divide and conquer’ us by making us scared of the ‘terrorists’, when in fact the real terrorists are those who are in charge of supposedly protecting us.

The ‘banking crisis’ is based on a money system that is designed to impoverish and enslave us; the whole system of how money is created and who is in charge of the money needs to be changed.

‘Government’ is supposed to be a representative body to carry out actions on behalf of the people; it is supposed to be ‘of the people, by the people, for the people’.

For a further example, take the words of James Wilson, one of the lesser known of America’s founding fathers:
“Government … should be formed to secure and enlarge the exercise of the natural rights of its members; and every government which has not this in view as its principal object is not a government of the legitimate kind.”

Unfortunately, for the most part, the ‘governments’ of most countries are not governments of the legitimate kind because it is the ‘governments’ that are lying to us.

The ‘people’ who are in charge no longer ‘exercise the natural rights’ of the members of their country, instead their actions are designed to benefit themselves, Big Business and, most importantly, the elites who are behind them.

This is no conspiracy theory, this is conspiracy fact.

To quote Hitler, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”

The lies we have been told are so big that, for the most part and with the co-operation of a controlled and compliant mainstream media, most people believe them.

Most people believe that we are being threatened by terrorists bent on destroying our ‘freedom’. Unfortunately the laws that have been enacted to purportedly defend those freedoms have the completely opposite effect; they are eroding our freedoms in the name of freedom. Ironic indeed!!

Some relevant quotes from George Orwell,
“All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome.”
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
“All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting.”

If all of this is news to you, please visit the videos page of our website, from the link HERE, where you can view a number of films that will provide you with the information you need to understand what is happening in the world today and why things are the way they are and what you can do about it.

Then it is up to you what you choose to do about it, which is indeed your right.

However, we believe in your Right to have all the information you need, which is why we are making this information available to you.

As the United Nations states on its document, “They are your rights, familiarise yourself with them. Help to promote and defend them for yourself as well as for your fellow human beings.”

Please help us to spread this information in the ‘spirit of brotherhood’.

We all have the ‘right’ to claim our Human Rights for ourselves and for everyone in the world so that we can all have ‘life, liberty and security of person’.

Posted in Freedom of Speech, Human Rights, Media Failure | 6 Comments

Vivisection is Unscientific

Posted on August 2, 2011 by NoR

It is quite likely that the subject of vivisection makes you feel uncomfortable, but nevertheless you may still consider that it is an essential part of scientific and medical investigation; that without these experiments medical progress would be severely hampered.

To put it bluntly, in order to ensure that the human race receives the medical care it deserves, the poor animals must suffer.

But nothing could be further from the truth.

However, the basis for this statement is not the moral argument about whether or not it is right for animals to suffer, but on the scientific basis of using animals as a suitable model for humans.

The scientific evidence shows that, contrary to what we are told, there is no animal species that is a suitable model for humans.

The ONLY correct models for humans are, without exception, humans.

But even humans vary physiologically. After all, different people react differently to different substances.

Take the obvious example of allergies; some people have ‘allergic’ reactions to certain substances to which other people do not react. So even humans cannot be reliable models for all other humans.

A further vital point that is rarely, if ever, divulged by vivisectors is that using an animal as a model for investigating human diseases would only be relevant if animals generally suffered from the same diseases as humans.

However, the evidence shows that in the vast number of cases, animals do not contract the same diseases as humans and therefore, in order to be able to undertake a study, diseased states are artificially created in the animals. This artificial process can never provide a proper scientific model for how a natural disease will occur and develop and therefore can never be a reliable indicator for assessing the correct treatment of the disease in humans.

The evidence also shows that animal reactions to chemicals, drugs and food additives can vary within a species. Vast differences can occur in the results of experiments on a range of animals and these differences can be dose related, for example a very low dose of one chemical may have a dramatic effect on a mouse and yet a large dose of the same chemical may only have a very small effect on a rat.

All of this confusion can only leave the ‘researcher’ wondering which animal model to use as the basis for how humans may (or may not) react.

And in case you may be wondering why apes should not be used as suitable models, because after all they are genetically closest to man, the following should clarify the position:

“There are many known differences between chimps and humans. Certainly there are enough differences to make the use of chimps for medical experiments as if they were human nonsensical. No chimps … have been of any use in the experiments they were used for … .The whole wretched business (and it is big business) should be stopped and stopped now.” Professor Vernon Reynolds, primatologist and professor of biological anthropology, University of Oxford

To ensure that you are left in no doubt as to why rats and mice are used, it is quite definitely not because they are sufficiently similar to humans to be suitable models but because they are cheap, small and easy to handle: these are not scientific criteria!

The former vivisector Professor Pietro Croce’s own words sum up the situation :

“Even the choice between different species of animal is illusory: actually one is not even speaking of there being a choice at all, but of a kind of fishing blindly among different possibilities in a haphazard way or, worse, according to opportunistic criteria in deciding which animal is more or less convenient: the mouse, the rabbit, the guinea pig are “convenient” because they are easy to keep; cats and dogs because they are easily and cheaply obtainable: everything except the one element which ought to be the deciding factor: an animal having morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics applicable to man. However, such an animal can only be man himself.
An experimental model of the human being does not exist. Every species, all the varieties of animals and even individuals of the same species are different from each other. No experimentation carried out on one species can be extrapolated to any other, including man. To suppose that such extrapolation could be legitimate is the main reason for the failure and sometimes for the catastrophes which are inflicted upon us by modern medicine, especially in the area of drugs. Too little is spoken or written about certain facts, partly in deference to a ‘science’ which purports to be the “saviour of mankind”, but more usually to avoid provoking the huge economic and political interests which prop up this benefactor.”

There is, and has been for a very long time, strong scientific criticism against vivisection, not only as a scientific procedure, but also because the results obtained from it are misleading and dangerous. The following quotations demonstrate this fact:

“Medicine is, essentially, a science of observation, in which experimentation is only a minor part of the medical investigation. But the worst of it is that this minor part has been contaminated by a gross error – that of having taken animals as models for humans.”
Professor Dr Pietro Croce

“The reason why I am against animal research is because it doesn’t work, it has no scientific value and every good scientist knows that.”
- Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, M.D., Head of the Licensing Board for the State of Illinois, paediatrician & gynaecologist for 30 years, medical columnist & best-selling author, recipient of numerous awards for excellence in medicine.

“Like every member of my profession, I was brought up in the belief that almost every important fact in physiology had been obtained by vivisection and that many of our most valued means of saving life and diminishing suffering had resulted from experiments on the lower animals. I now know that nothing of the sort is true concerning the art of surgery: and not only do I not believe that vivisection has helped the surgeon one bit, but I know that it has often led him astray.”
- Prof. Lawson Tait, M.D., Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons (F.R.C.S.), Edinburgh & England. Hailed as the most distinguished surgeon of his day, the originator of many of surgery’s modern techniques, and recipient of numerous awards for medical excellence.

“Animal model systems differ from their human counterparts. Conclusions drawn from animal research, when applied to human beings, are likely to delay progress, mislead, and do harm to the patient. Vivisection, or animal experimentation, should be abolished.”
- Dr. Moneim Fadali, M.D., F.A.C.S., Diplomat American Board of Surgery and American Board of Thoracic Surgery, UCLA faculty, Royal College of Surgeons of Cardiology, Canada.

If all this is news to you, you will also be interested to discover that the current medical paradigm is also based on unsound science.

You can find out more about becoming and remaining naturally healthy from our book, Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill and Drugs Can’t Cure You.

Posted in Allergies, Animal Welfare, Freedom of Speech, Health, Health Freedom, Media Failure, Science | Leave a comment

The Sunshine – Friend or Foe?

Posted on June 30, 2011 by NoR

Are you confused with the conflicting advice about the benefits or risks of exposure to sunlight?

First we were told that sunshine is good for us, then we were told it is bad for us. Now it seems that it is good for us again.

According to a recent news story, “Spending an average of three hours a day exposed to sunlight can slash the risk of breast cancer by up to 50 per cent, according to research.”

This health benefit is gained by the body’s production of vitamin D in the skin.

The advice seems to be that we should spend more time in the sun, but protect ourselves with a high protection factor sun cream to avoid burning and avoid the risk of skin cancer, which sounds like good advice until you look further at the evidence.

The evidence shows that a very large number of people are vitamin D deficient and that this deficiency leads to a susceptibility to some diseases, including cancer.

Whilst most people probably obtain sufficient vitamin D to prevent rickets, it is unlikely that the recommended daily amount provides sufficient vitamin D to prevent other equally problematic deficiency symptoms.

The best source of vitamin D is undoubtedly from the sun.

But excessive exposure to the sun, especially at its hottest, causes burning and other skin damage.

Sunscreens will allow you to spend more time in the sun but will prevent the sun from activating the much-needed production of vitamin D in your body.

However, evidence shows that conventional sunscreen products may contain some chemicals that are carcinogenic.

It is important to make informed decisions based on the evidence.

It may also help to take notice of the way of life of people who live in hot countries. For example, in the Mediterranean area most people stay out of the sun in the hottest part of the day or if they sit outside they sit in the shade. They invariably have a rest at the hottest time of day. If they sunbathe, they do so in the cooler parts of the day, morning or evening.

An extremely useful article about the importance of sunlight exposure and the dangers of sunscreen chemicals can be found HERE

It would seem therefore that the best approach is a ‘sensible’ one after all; make sure you spend time in the sunshine but do not spend hours lying out in the sun at the hottest time of the day; protect yourself with natural sun protection products if you need to use them; avoid skincare products that contain toxic chemicals and most importantly have a healthy diet to boost your natural health.

Posted in Cancer, Health, Healthy Food, Media Failure, Science | Leave a comment

Fluoride – The Hidden Poison

Posted on June 14, 2011 by NoR

Fluoride is a worldwide problem, because the WHO (World Health Organization) states that fluoride has beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of tooth decay and the policies of the WHO affect us all, wherever we live.

So you may be wondering what is the issue that requires a blog entry?

Quite simply, fluoride is a poison.

Fluoride is a known neurotoxin.

Fluoride has been linked in scientific studies to increased incidence of bone cancer.

Fluoride is so dangerous it is used in rat poison.

If this is news to you, read on.

Dr Paul Connett has been researching the whole subject of fluoride for about 15 years and on his website is a statement written by him in 2000, which includes the following:
“The more I have read the more concerned I have become over the dangers posed by fluoride and the very poor science underpinning its supposed efficacy in protecting children’s teeth. How we ever allowed such a toxic substance into the drinking water is staggering. Even though fluoride’s toxicity is rated higher than lead, the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) maximum contaminant level for lead in water is 15 ppb (parts per billion) whereas the level allowed for fluoride is 4,000 ppb. The recommended level for artificial fluoridation of the drinking water of 1 part per million (1 ppm = 1,000 ppb) was established in 1945, and it hasn’t been changed since, even though today we (and our children) are getting fluoride from many other additional sources, including toothpaste, other dental products, mouthwashes, processed food, some vitamin tablets, and beverages.”

For further information about your possible sources of fluoride exposure please click HERE

It is also possible that the salt you consume may have been fluoridated.
According to The National Fluoride Information Centre:
“Salt fluoridation was introduced in Switzerland in 1955 and it is now estimated that fluoridated salt is available to nearly 200 million people worldwide, including Europe, Central and South America and the Caribbean. It is the preferred method of fluoridation on mainland Europe and is widely available in France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Czech Republic and Slovakia.”

However, you may feel that the benefits of fluoride for the prevention of tooth decay outweigh these dangers. If this is so and if you are unfamiliar with the counter-argument to the so-called ‘benefits’ of fluoride, the following will be revelatory.

According to Dr Connett, when asked in an interview “How much fluoride is there in a typical size of toothpaste? Is there enough to kill one child?” he answered “The child would probably be sick, vomit long before they got through a whole tube of toothpaste. But there is no question that fluoride, not an excessive amount, can cause serious harm. There have been examples of children who swallowed the gel that is used for topical treatment and they died as a consequence. So fluoride is extreme.”

Further evidence is provided by Dr. Phyllis J. Mullenix, Ph.D, who is a pharmacologist and toxicologist by training. In the 1980s, Dr. Mullenix was Head of the Toxicology Department at the Forsyth Dental Center, a world renowned dental research institution affiliated with the Harvard Medical School. She was invited to start Forsyth’s Toxicology Department because of her expertise in neurotoxicology.

“Using an animal model developed for the study of dental fluorosis, we expected rats drinking fluoride-treated water would behave the same as matching controls. They did not. The scientific literature led us to believe that rats would easily tolerate 175 ppm fluoride in their drinking water. They did not. Reports in the literature indicated that fluoride would not cross the blood brain barrier. But it did. Prenatal exposure to fluoride was not supposed to permanently alter behavioral outcome. It did. Like walking into quicksand our confidence that brain function was impervious to fluoride was sinking.”
“We concluded that the rat study flagged potential for motor dysfunction, IQ deficits and/or learning disabilities in humans. Confident as we were, the data were only one piece of the puzzle, the overall picture was still emerging. Soon thereafter we learned of two epidemiological studies (Fluoride, 1995-1996) from China showing IQ deficits in children over-exposed to fluoride via drinking water or soot from burning coal. A recent review (International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1994) listed case reports of CNS effects in humans excessively exposed to fluoride, information that spans almost 60 years. A common theme appeared in the reported effects: impaired memory and concentration, lethargy, headache, depression and confusion.”

Scientific evidence from Chinese research on Fluoride’s neurotoxicity is available from HERE

But if you are in any doubt about the dangers of fluoride, these words by Dr Russell Blaylock MD from his book Health and Nutrition Secrets, should help you.
“We have seriously contaminated our food and beverage supply. But there is one instance where the danger is higher than in all of these examples, and that is the drinks packaged in aluminium cans and bottles, including beers, fruit juices, sodas, and other popular drinks. Aluminium is also very toxic, especially to the nervous system. When aluminium is combined with fluoride, even in minute concentrations, it forms a very powerful brain toxin.
So in the case of diet drinks in aluminium cans, the very brain-toxic aluminium fluoride compound co-exists with multiple toxins found in aspartame, thus creating the most powerful governement-approved toxic soup imaginable. With the strong association among aluminium, excitotoxins, aluminium fluoride complexes, and Alzheimer’s disease, it would be completely irresponsible to encourage people to consume this toxic mixture. Yet, this is done literally billions of times every year in advertising. It is important to remember that the aluminium can has been around for only about 3 decades, and most toxin-related diseases take years of accumulation to produce the full clinical expression of the disorder.”

More information on the extent of fluoride pollution is available HERE

You can watch a recent and extremely interesting interview with Dr Paul Connett.
Part 1 HERE
Part 2 HERE

Fortunately there are now many products that are fluoride free.

Now that you know some of the toxins contained in the products you and your family use both in and on your bodies, checking their ingredients has never been more important.

You can find out more about this subject in our book, Why Germs Don’t Make You Ill & Drugs Can’t Cure You.

Posted in Fluoride, Health, Health Freedom, Media Failure, Science | 1 Comment