If you only obtain your news from mainstream sources, you are probably still under the impression that the tragic events of September 11th 2001 were the work of 19 terrorists who hijacked 4 planes. They then expertly flew those planes, deliberately crashing 2 of them into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre in New York and crashing another plane into the Pentagon after an extremely expert manoeuvre. The hijackers of the 4th plane were somehow overpowered by the passengers and crew but still subsequently crashed into a muddy field in Pennsylvania.
If you believe this is the true story of the events of that day, and many people still do believe it, it may be a real shock to you to learn that nothing could be further from the truth.
Whilst all the details about the events of that day are still not fully known, what IS known is that the official story promulgated by the U.S. and other governments via the world mainstream media, and most recently by the BBC, is most definitely not true.
The statement that ‘the official story is not true’ is based on vast amounts of evidence and leads to the inevitable conclusion that if the official story is a lie, there must be a different story.
But, before you shout ‘conspiracy theory’, please read below a small sample of the compelling evidence for this view:
1. The collapse of the Twin Towers due to fires alone is ‘physically impossible’, according to expert scientists, especially as
a) the Towers were designed to withstand the impact of a large plane and
b) the steel frames were certified to have been easily able to withstand fires caused by burning jet fuel without collapsing.
2. All three WTC building collapses reveal many features of controlled demolition, in addition to this fact there are a large number of witnesses who heard explosions in various parts of each of the buildings before they collapsed.
3. All three Towers collapsed at almost free-fall speed as if there was no resistance from the thousands of tons of structure below. This also is physically impossible, except in the circumstances that the resistance was removed by controlled demolition.
A further problem arises from the speedy ‘Ground Zero cleanup’ operation, which cleared away and sold off large amounts of the steel from the Towers before it could be examined, effectively removing evidence from a crime scene. This begs the question, why was crucial forensic evidence removed so quickly?
Amongst the debris that was collected by various people even before the ‘cleanup’ there was sufficient evidence of explosive materials that has been identified as such by experts, many of whom belong to the ’911 truth movement’.
This vast 911 truth movement includes a great number of highly qualified architects, engineers, physicists and other professionals who have studied the evidence and have been convinced that such evidence not only does not support the official story but that it quite clearly supports the story of an ‘inside job’.
Some people, David Ray Griffin in particular, have studied the 911 Commission Report and found it full of errors and omissions. Others, Dr Steven Jones in particular, have studied the NIST Report and found that its conclusion of ‘fires plus impact damage’ being responsible for the collapse of the Towers is not supported by the evidence. Dr Jones, amongst others, has conducted several experiments to support his controlled-demolition hypothesis.
As the evidence proves, the Twin Towers and WTC7 were brought down by controlled demolitions that were very carefully planned and executed. This type of operation would have taken months to organise.
The main thrust of the 911 truth movement is to force a new investigation; but this time an investigation that is truly independent; one that will look at all of the evidence; one that will listen to all the witness testimonies and one that will not start from the assumption that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda terrorists were responsible.
The new investigation must answer questions that the 911 Commission Report avoided or ignored. Among the questions to be answered are:
What really happened on September 11th 2001?
Who was responsible for the events of that day and the deaths of over 3000 people?
Who were the alleged ‘hijackers’?
Were the planes hijacked at all? If they were not, what really happened to those planes and their passengers?
If Osama bin Laden died in December 2001, who was the person impersonating him in the ‘videos’ supposedly claiming responsibility?
Was this another ‘false flag’ attack designed to initiate a ‘war on terror’ in order for an elite group within the US to implement their already stated aims encapsulated within the document by PNAC called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, calling for ‘A New Pearl Harbor’?
The events of that day have implications not only for the people of New York and not only for Americans; they have implications for absolutely everyone, wherever you live.
Whilst it is important that you make up your own mind, you cannot make an informed decision if you do not have all the information you need to make that informed decision.
Therefore it is important to familiarise yourself with the evidence, no matter how the mainstream media choose to refute such evidence, however, please be aware that what I have listed in this blog is only a very small sample of the evidence that is available.
If, like many thousands of other people around the world, you view the evidence and are convinced that it proves the official story is a lie, please send a link to this blog to everyone you know.
There is no ‘war on terrorism’; it is a war on our freedom. We have a right to our freedom; we must not allow our freedom to be taken away from us.
If you are new to this information, or if you are aware of it but you wish to know more, the following websites will be extremely useful as they have been set up by some of the professionals referred to and contain plenty of information that you will not find in the mainstream media.
Additionally, please watch the preview to a new documentary from the link HERE